|
|
|
|
최은희 ( Choi Eun-Hee ) - 한국성서대학교 간호학과
장은희 ( Jang Eun-Hee ) - 우석대학교 간호학과
최지연 ( Choi Ji-Youn ) - 중앙대학교병원 감염관리실
이소정 ( Lee So-Jung ) - 중앙대학교병원 간호부
서효경 ( Seo Hyo-Kyung ) - 중앙대학교병원 간호부
박경숙 ( Park Kyung-Sook ) - 중앙대학교 적십자간호대학
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the approaches, methods and questions asked in intensive care unit studies published in Korean journals and the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) from 1992 to 2011. Only quantitative studies were reviewed.
Methods: A total of 144 studies published in four Korean Journals and 521 studies published in American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: The most frequently used research design reported in Korean journals were surveys (83.5%), protocol development (10.1%), and randomized controlled trials (6.2%). In AJCC, the most frequently reported design was survey research (90.4%) and randomized controlled trials (16.1%). The most frequent nursing intervention reported in the AJCC was tube care (10.8%), and in Korean journals the intervention of suctioning (10.8%). In Korea, nurses were more likely to study instrument measurements (31.0%) and positioning (13.5%). In reported studies in the AJCC there were more reports on emotional support, exercise, and measurement research.
Conclusion: There is overlap in the type of studies between the two countries in term of study design, whereas the types of nursing problems studied differed in United States and Korea. The result suggests that there were gaps and those more diverse studies and physiological measurements are needed.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
중환자간호, 간호연구, 동향
Intensive care, Nursing research, Trend
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
|